The Lancet has increasingly become much less of a medical journal and much more of a political front for the anti-Bush dhimmi loving political moonbat left. Readers will recall that its previous published propaganda job, claiming 100,000 Iraqi deaths, was published in the weeks running up to the 2004 US election. Only the moonbat fraternity still put any faith in that discredited garbage and now, with weeks to go to the 2006 US elections, out comes the latest nonsense. Quelle surpise!
The new study that contends nearly 655,000 Iraqis have died because of the war, suggesting a far higher death toll than other estimates. For Burnham's new study, researchers gathered data from a sample of 1,849 Iraqi households with a total of 12,801 residents from late May to early July. That sample was used to extrapolate the total figure. The estimate deals with deaths up to July.
The survey participants attributed about 31 percent of violent deaths to coalition forces. It does not (natch) distinguish if these were of Jihadists and Saddamite remnants. Just violent deaths - caused by those bloodthirsty Americans, right?? These new huge figure far exceeds normal media counts and is more than 20 times the estimate of 30,000 civilian deaths that President Bush gave in a speech in December.
Just so we can all understand where Richard Horton the ...ahem..impartial Editor of the Lancet is coming from..just watch this. Hat-tip to LGF...
AND FOR DOUBTING LIBERALS WHO STILL BELIEVE THAT FIRST LANCET PROPOGANDA COUP...
Read this
and then this
and after that, this
and then finally, this
And ONCE you have read all this detailed analysis, and see just how ludicrous and biased the Lancet printed claims were, how many of you you will howl at the moon and continue to repeat Horton's hoax?
Fool me once, shame on you....
Recent Comments